English & Deutsch

On this page there will in due time be translations of some of the most internationally interesting entries. The first one to come will be the one on the ambassador, and the latest ones on Tristan and Isolda. If you find something of interest, not yet translated – call me!! (-Hey, Stupid! How do I know what’ good if I don’t know any Swedish?) (-Well..’tskind-a-tricky.. Use the pictures, names and Youtube quot:s..Anyway, call me! It’ isnt always easy to translate,and it takes time but it is my end to at least have something in English . )

Love! Larvad (larvad@live.se)

———–

Auf diese Seite, gibt es manchmal Übersetzungen verschiedene Artikeln meiner (Erst auf Englisch, danach Deutsch.) Aber, wenn jemand irgendwann etwas finden sollte, das nicht auf Deutsch gibt. Schreib mir, Bitte!!(-Aber bist du denn blöd? Ich verstehe keinerlei von Schwedisch – Denn was?) (-Nöö-Jaa…S’ist schwer, aber..vielleicht durch die Bilder, Namen und Youtube-Zitaten.. Schreib doch!! Es ist schwer zu übersetzen, aber spaß, und nützlich. Und Ich wünsche etwas neu auf Deutsch manchmal zu haben)

Tschüs! Larvad (larvad@live.se)

Welcome! Willkommen!

*

1, Pippi Langstrumpf, oder Schweinenschlacht mit Vorschneidemesser.

Ein paar Jahren gewesen; Der Schwedische Künstler Palle Thorson hat alle Sequenzen wo man die Schlüpfern der Pippi sehen konnte gepubliziert. Abscheulich, aber sein gute Ziel war zu zeigen das Kinderschlüpfern heute, gestern noch nicht, Sexualisiert sind. Aber: Die Frage ist noch da:

Können, oder mögen wir, eine Heldin wie Pippi, wie das brauchen?

In „Emmas Glück“ kann man eine Phantasiegebilde über Pippi sehen: Ein angriffslustig, geile, junge Frau, eine Enzelgängerin die Ebern und Schweinen Schlachtet – oder – Eine vereinsamte junge Frau, mit hoche Vorbilden, erwachsene fantasievolle Gefühle, die auch alte Überlieferungen trotzen wagt.

Warum diese Film mir gefällt, ist denn die moralische, ethische und sittliche

Fragen über Tot, Moral, Sexualität, Euthanasie, Schlacht sind in die Armen dieser bezaubernder Frau geradezu getragen, und nicht durch die Wörter einer Dissertation oder Leitartikels. Fragen wie z.B:

1 Mögen wir spielenmit sterbende Tieren, das wir getötet haben

2 Warum und wenn mögen wir unser geliebter töten?

3 Mögen wir Menschen und Tieren töten nach die selben Weisen und Sitten?

4 Kann man eine literarische Gestalt für alle seine eigene Fragen brauchen?

Kann man eine literarische Gestalt für alle Fragen brauchen?

Das glaub ich! das dünkt mich! Aber wir müssen nimmer vergessen dass wir vielleicht andere Leute verwunden können, oder verwunden geraten können. Das Astrid Lindgren verwunden war, und böse ist veständlich, denn Pippi ist ihre, und die Schauspielerin nur ein Kind war, aber alle andre Leute, warum war sie verwundete von der Künstler aber nicht von die Dänische Muhammedbildern? Dass Pippi, in Schweden vorne von Muhammed steht, das ist ganz natürlich, aber es ist nicht verfassungsgemäßlich.

Das Film Emmas Glück ist nichtdestoweniger ein hübsches versuch verworrene Fragen zu diskutieren. Jördis Triebel und Jürgen Vogel sind beide ausgezeichnete (wie immer?) und der Name der Frau ist Emma, nicht Pippi. Pippi war nuhr eine Inspiration und Archetyp.

.

2, Snow White and the madness of truth: ”Just U-turn in the middle east!”

I mentioned earlier that my opinions once made a u-turn inside a needles eye once, or twice: The most dramatically U-turn took place during the strange occasion in Stockholm, as the ambassador Zvi Mazel, during an conference on genocide, thrashed an art installation by the artist Dror Feiler. Everyone said in one voice: “That just isn’t done!”, and of course: It isn’t. But why did he do it?and who was this Mr Mazel? No one really cared, and instead all were fondling the questions on who Dror Feiler was, and what his work for peace meant.

I got more and more curious about what the articles didn’t write, especially as suddenly Mr Sharon, with all his heart supported Mr Mazel, hence, I decided to look for the news in Israeli papers – and there it was – the U-turn! In both Ha-Aretz and Jerusalem Post, and suddenly in the Swedish paper Dagens Nyheter, quoting its Israeli colleagues, you could learn that these three guys both knew, and fought each other before, when Mr Feiler deserted the Israeli army, from under General Sharon.

The moral right to desert the army: Of course you have the right to desert, or criticize the politics of your country, and if Dror Feiler made both of it, both Mr Sharon and Mr Mazel must be able to face it, and if there’s a subpoena for deserting the army, Mr Feiler will have to face his destiny.

The problem lies in whether the actions at the exhibitions were comprehensible or not. If you as an Israeli ambassador with experiences and knowledge on different wars on Israel, and suicide-bombings on Israeli civilians, suddenly get to know that a deserter has made an art installation, that is possible, if you want, to interpret as an anti semitical statement, glorifying suicide attacks, would you be surprised if you were provoked? Or? And if it was a deserter publically known for his desertation and “anti-Israeli commitments” (read critical remarks on the politics) of course it wouldn’t be suitable

Knowledge? – arrogance? I really don’t know what would bother me the most: If the Swedish art curators, and conference hosts knew about all this on Feiler-Mazel-Sharon, or if they didn’t

The fact that we got ourselves a minor diplomatic quarrel with Israel. At major crises, threatening the national security of Sweden, the freedom of speech is no longer applicable, The security of the nation is always prior to freedom of speech especially if there are possibilities of subpoena on two different laws at the same time. But for media in Sweden the freedomof speech is always prior to security, and for many journalists of course prior to reflection, taste and wits.

U-turn: I haven’t changed my overarching opinions on the subject: Middle East. I still have critical opinions on how both sides use violence, and as the stronger part, I think that Israel should have a greater responsibility. And When it comes to responsibility, of course the “barrier” is outrageous – although it actually seems to work, as spontaneous suicide attacks seem to have decreased drastically. The fact that powers outside of Palestine and Israel, are promoting these attacks is totally unacceptable. The problem is neither black nor white, but black-n-white-grey-mixed to its extreme. And it is becoming more and more blurred in colour for each incident, making it impossible to find an easy opinion. Maybe my luck?

What would have happened with my opinions if I hadn’t experienced this in my solitude, but in a certain group where all thought the same about everything? Would I have been able to see the rationality in the foolish reaction of Mr Mazel? As the knews were presented by Swedish media, and with indignation for Mazel’s attack on the freedom of speech, there was only room for one opinion.

‘t’s Not my war! How would I react then, if my loved ones were killed by a bomb, and I, at an exhibition abroad, would see the murderer pictured in a flattering way, would I then be able to act in a diplomatic and appropriate way? But that is the reality that both Zvi Mazel and Handi Jaradat (the suicide bomber pictured at the exhibition) share, to see their loved ones die slaughtered, a reality I find that both the powers inducing and using suicidebombers for their sordid purposes, the artist Dror Feiler and, in it’s way even media used for their own purposes.

We have a freedom of speech, to help the poor and frail of our society, not to make money from their misery, and then defend our right to do so.

–